I Tested the Pixel 11 Pro’s Camera in Beautiful Paris

5 hours ago 1
Image of a hand holding a Google Pixel phoneThe Pixel 11 Pro has a variety of upgrades for photographers.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

The Pixel 11 Pro is Google’s latest flagship phone, and I got to take it on a photo walk through the colorful streets of mid-summer Paris. Très charmant! Alongside a suite of upgrades like its Tensor G6 processor and delightful new peachy color, there are a bunch of camera updates. And, as a photographer myself, I was keen to see what was up. 

So it might seem that most of the camera hardware is the same. It’s the usual trio of wide, ultrawide and telephoto lenses all at the same resolutions as last year’s model. But Google says that the main image sensor is new and generally offers better quality. And the telephoto sensor is physically larger.

But honestly, one of my favorite new features is called Camera Looks, and it’s all about the software. Similar to Apple’s Photographic Styles, Camera Looks change the colors and exposure in your images to give them a more creative look than just taking clinically accurate photos. 

Image of columns of a building on a sunny dayLovely tones and gentle contrast from the main camera with the ‘Vanilla’ Camera Look.Andrew Lanxon/CNET
Image of a building with a blue skyGreat tones and spot-on exposure from the main camera.Andrew Lanxon/CNET
Image of a building with blue skyAnd there’s no discernible color shift when you switch to the ultrawide lens.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

I really like the looks, and I actually had them applied to the camera pretty much my whole day. You can also customize each look further, adding some warmth or adjusting the depth of shadows and even adding grain. Typically, I really like the grainy look you get from authentic analog film — it’s why I recently spent a fortune on a Leica M6 film camera — but I’ve gotta say, I don’t love the grain effect that the Pixel 11 Pro applies.

Image of a man sitting on a wallThere’s a lot of grain in this picture. I know that because I specifically added loads to the scene when I shot it. I probably shouldn’t have.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

It looks very digital and not especially realistic. I shot all my photos in JPEG and in RAW, which bypasses Google’s processing, allowing me to do my own edits instead. 

I’ve done this with a few shots, actually, as sometimes the Camera Looks can be a bit…much. The Black Tie effect is a very high-key black-and-white style that won’t suit every scene, but did play an absolute blinder when I got the phone low for this shot of this person carrying a plant. 

Black and white image of a man carrying a plantIt’s a lovely, punchy shot.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

And I liked it for this portrait mode shot with the 5x telephoto lens. 

Image of a man giving the peace signThe amount of bokeh in the background is perfect.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

Though I definitely prefer the ones we did in color using the Editorial Camera Look.

Image of a man standing and smiling at the cameraI think the colors in the ‘Editorial’ look have worked well here.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

But generally, it was the “Vanilla” Look that I stuck with for most of the day. 

A new feature for the phones is Magic Capture, which shoots a few seconds of video and uses AI to identify the still frame that best captures the moment, then saves that one for you.

Image of a child skateboarding off a rampMagic Capture really nailed the decisive moment here.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

I put it to use with a couple of skaters I found, and it was surprisingly effective. All I had to do was just film the action and not worry about capturing the best moment — the phone would do that for me. 

I think the phone definitely highlighted the best shots for me, and while it kind of takes the skill out of nailing that decisive moment, that’s kind of the point. It’s not really for pro action photographers who know exactly when to hit the shutter; it’s more for parents who want to capture an awesome moment of their kid on their bike but don’t want to try again and again to get the shot they want. 

Image of a man walking next to a bridgeWhile I initially liked the look I chose for this photo, I don’t like how blown out the sky is.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

I do like the look that I created on the phone here. It’s definitely got that feel of a summer day, but I do think the sky has been blown out, arguably, a bit too much. 

Image of a man walking next to a bridgeBut because I also shot the image in RAW, I was able to do my own edit in Lightroom, and I was surprised at how much dynamic range the phone had really captured.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

But again, I shot in raw too, so a few tweaks in Lightroom and I discovered that the phone definitely had captured a lot more dynamic range than the JPEG suggested, giving me much more scope to edit the image how I wanted. 

Image of people on scooters in ParisAnd again, I found the shadows a bit too deep in the shot using the Camera Looks.Andrew Lanxon/CNET
Image of people on scooters in ParisSo I made my own edit to the raw file in Lightroom, and I really like the look I achieved.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

But otherwise, most of my images were straight out of the Pixel’s camera. 

Image of a padlock with writing on itTaken with the 5x telephoto lens, I love how much background bokeh there is here.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

The 5x telephoto lens has been tweaked to let you focus closer, turning it into something of a macro lens. I put it to use on this shot of a padlock, and I love the shallow depth of field it produced. 

But if you want to take things further, that zoom can now reach 120x magnification. That’s basically at the level of an actual telescope, though there’s an important thing to keep in mind. Once you go beyond 30x zoom, the phone uses generative AI to artificially recreate the details in your images, which is good or bad, depending on your perspective. 

Image comparing two levels of AI processingOn the left is the raw file from the 120x zoom. It’s basically just a collection of pixels. On the right is the generative AI’s interpretation.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

I shot this image of the French flag on a building that was so far away I could barely even see it. The results speak for themselves. The raw version of that shot (left) is basically just a handful of pixels, yet the AI has reconstructed it (right) with all kinds of new details.

But the problem for me is that those details aren’t real. Or at least, they might not be real. The camera is essentially seeing what’s in front of it and rebuilding that scene almost entirely using generative AI, meaning that what you’re seeing in the finished image is really more of an interpretation of what you saw. 

But it’s up to you as to whether that matters. As a photographer, I don’t want generative AI anywhere near my images. I want to know that what I’ve captured in an image is actually what I saw, not simply an algorithm’s interpretation. You’ll have to draw your own ethical lines with tools like this.

An image of a food stallStrong colors and excellent details from the main camera.Andrew Lanxon/CNET
Image of a man in running clothesI love the dramatic, low-angle paired with the ultrawide lens, but I don’t love the strong grain effect applied. That’s my fault.Andrew Lanxon/CNET
Image of a tired familyA classic street photo, converted to black and white in Lightroom from the raw file.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

Anyway, the afternoon rolled on, and I continued my walk with the phone, trying to indulge in some street-style photography along the way until I eventually came to an iconic spot overlooking the Eiffel Tower. I switched lenses and styles here, shooting quickly to capture some of the moments as they unfolded before me. 

Image of a family looking at the Eiffel TowerI think the teal of the sky is quite unnatural here.Andrew Lanxon/CNET
Image of a woman on her phoneAlthough I think the tones work really well here, giving it a feel of a magazine fashion shoot.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

I tried out what I think was the Editorial Camera Look (though it might have been called something else), and I think it goes a bit hard on the teal sky in some of these, though I do like how it looks sometimes.

It’s too early for me to give a real verdict on the cameras on the new Pixels. You’ll need to wait for my full review and for me to put them up against rivals like the iPhone 17 Pro or Galaxy S26 Ultra

But I do really like a lot of the photos I took on this little photo walk. The overall image quality is solid, and while I’m somewhat morally opposed to the generative AI in the 120x zoom, I do think tools like Magic Capture can be genuinely helpful. I’m thrilled to see more creative shooting options with the Camera Looks tool. 

A hand holds a Google phoneGotta love that peachy tone.Andrew Lanxon/CNET

I also want to spend more time using it and do a better job of it myself — it’s really handy that the style settings you apply will remain. However, it also means that the heavy-handed grain I chose earlier in the day was still active in images I took later, and it’s…not great. 

But we must all learn from our mistakes, even though experience has taught me that I never learn a damn thing. 

Andrew Lanxon

Andrew Lanxon

Editor at Large; Lead Photographer, Europe

When he's not testing the latest phones or phone cameras, Andrew can normally be found with his own camera in hand or behind his drums or eating his stash of home-cooked food -- sometimes all at once.

Read Entire Article
Lifestyle | Syari | Usaha | Finance Research