14 hours ago
3
Using data collected between 2021 and 2023 from about 50,000 water systems, the Environmental Working Group identified 324 contaminants in drinking water across the country. Numbers like these may make you want to add bottled water to your grocery list, but inflation and grocery store prices might change your mind. In fact, you can save hundreds of dollars by using a water filter pitcher (about $70/year) instead of drinking bottled water (up to $900/year). That's why CNET has tested over a dozen water filter pitchers, focusing on three primary tests to measure how effective these filters are: TDS, pH and chlorine. Keep reading to find the perfect pitcher for your household.
- The Best Water Filter Pitcher for 2025
- What's the best water filter pitcher?
- Best water filter pitchers of 2025
- Best water filter pitcher
- Best Brita water filter
- Most stylish water filter pitcher
- Best pitcher for adding alkaline to your water
- Best low-maintenance water pitcher filter
- Best faucet water filter
- Best filter cartridge
- Best water filter pitchers compared
- Which water filter do I need?
- Other water filter pitchers we tested
- How we test water filter pitchers
- Which water filter pitcher removes the most impurities?
- Factors to consider when choosing a water filter pitcher
- Water filter pitcher FAQs
What's the best water filter pitcher?
After rigorous testing, we found the ZeroWater 12-cup Water Filter Pitcher to be the best overall filter pitcher for 2025. It was unmatched in removing contaminants.
If you're ready to take home a pitcher for cleaner, better-tasting water, without the cost of bottled varieties, check out our rundown below. We've run all the tests, and we settled on the following models as the best water filter pitchers of 2025. Keep reading if you're thirsty for the details.
Best water filter pitchers of 2025
Pros
- Most effective at removing dissolved solids with -100% change in TDS
- Available in several sizes (12-52 cups)
- Midrange price of $25-$45
Cons
- Filters are expensive at $13+/filter
- Takes longer to filter
- No benchmark for how long filter lasts
Why we like it: Have you ever raised an eyebrow reading a company's marketing claims? I once tested a flashlight that claimed a lumen output of 200,000 -- bright enough to be seen from an airliner. The true value turned out to be a much more realistic 1,500 lumens. Suffice it to say I had my doubts when I read that ZeroWater could consistently remove a perfect 100% of TDS from water filtered through it.
ZeroWater is confident for a reason and even provides its own TDS testing meter with every pitcher to prove it. Although we still used our own test meter, the results were identical: 0 TDS remained across every trial and no chlorine was left suspended in the water either. It specifically reduces chlorine, zinc, fluoride, lead, mercury, copper and more.
Who is it best for: This formidable NSF/ANSI-certified water purifier pitcher is also affordable and sturdy, and it's available in a few sizes, all of which use the same five-stage filter to great effect. Those include a smaller 10-cup round pitcher, a 23-cup dispenser with a spigot and even a massive 5-gallon water jug that can be fitted onto a water cooler. Most of the sizes (minus the gallon jugs, of course) are storage-friendly, so you can keep them in your refrigerator easily.
Who should not get it: The only downside to these powerhouse filters is that they're more expensive to replace at $13+/filter, and it takes them somewhat longer to filter compared to the rest of the field, but neither is much of a surprise given how much better they actually filter the water.
Pros
- Does a solid job filtering water with -45.6% TDS change
- Inexpensive at $20
- Replacement filters cost $5-8/filter
Cons
- Removed fewer TDS than the ZeroWater pitcher
- Some models feel cheaply made
Why we like it: Brita is probably the best-known of the water filter pitcher brands, and while it wasn't included in our most recent round of tests, it still performed quite well in previous rounds of at-home testing, second only to the ZeroWater in the removal of total dissolved materials. It reduces the taste and odor of chlorine and also reduces copper, cadmium and mercury impurities.
Who is it best for: This model is a few bucks cheaper than a ZeroWater pitcher of the same size, making it one of the most budget-friendly water filter pitcher options. It comes with one filter and to make things even more cost-efficient, the replacement filters can be purchased for about $6 each if you buy them in a multipack. Each one is said to filter 40 gallons of water, enough for roughly two months of steady use (the same lifespan as ZeroWater). Brita also makes a more expensive "Longlast" filter that's designed to last three times as long as the standard filter. We tested one and found it performed significantly worse than the standard "Legacy" Brita filter.
Who should not get it: The Brita extracted about 40% of the TDS; not a bad showing, but still significantly less than the winner. It's OK for a budget-friendly water pitcher, but if you have a higher price range, you may want to purchase one of the pitchers that performed better in our tests.
Pros
- Elegant design
- Made from glass and stainless steel
- The only pitcher on this list that's dishwasher safe
Cons
- Expensive at $130
- Breakable because of glass
- No certifications listed
Why we like it: This stylish Swedish kitchen brand is best known for its elegant sparkling water makers but now offers an equally eye-catching filter pitcher. It was the best-looking of the bunch, made from a glass and stainless steel frame with a sleek overall design. It also did well in our tests, removing the second-most dissolved solids from our tap water.
Who is it best for: This dishwasher-safe pitcher is good-looking enough to set out for a dinner party. It's not as efficient as our top pick, the ZeroWater filter pitcher, but is about on par with the Brita pitcher models. Plus, it reduces limescale, chlorine and heavy metals such as lead and copper.
It’s worth noting that the Aarke uses a reusable filter -- you only need to buy the granules, which are easily loaded into the metal filter cartridge, helping you save on plastic waste. A three-pack of filter granules costs $25 on Aarke's website, about the same price as Brita replacement filters and less than half of what you'd pay for ZeroWater filters. One package of granules is estimated to filter about 31.7 gallons of water. That's about 9 gallons less than Brita claims its filters will purify. You can also buy Aarke enriching granules ($30) to alkalinize your water if you prefer.
Who should not get it: This is the most expensive pitcher on the list at $130, which may be outside your price range. Also, no NSF/ANSI certifications or any others were listed for this product.
Pros
- Best for adding alkaline to water, changing pH from 8.39 to 10.1
- Water filtered with this pitcher tasted great
Cons
- Expensive at $80
- Benefits of alkalinized water are murky
- Filters cost $26/filter
- Only one capacity at 8 cups
Why we like it: If the goal is to add alkaline to your water, then you'll want a completely different model. In a previous round of filter testing, we ran pH readings (measurements of how acidic or basic your water is) ranging from zero to 14; seven is a neutral reading.
Despite conflicting research on the topic, some people attribute health benefits to more basic (or alkaline) water. As a result, select companies make water pitchers with filters that actually add nutrients as your tap water passes through. The Seychelle pH20 pitcher took tap water from an already basic reading of 8.39 to 10.1, the largest increase out of the three alkaline pitchers in our test group. This pitcher's water filtration system uses two filters at a time, but they are supposed to last for up to 200 gallons.
Who is it best for: This pitcher would be best for someone who wants to add alkaline to their water more than they want a pitcher that simply filters water. It states that it removes lead, aluminum, asbestos, benzene, mercury, VOCs (volatile organic compounds) and chlorine.
Who should not get it: This is the second-most expensive pitcher on this list at $80, which may be outside of some people's budget. Filters also cost the most out of any filter on this list at $26/filter.
Pros
- Long-lasting filters up to 200 gallons
- Replacement filters are midrange at $14/filter
Cons
- Filtering performance wasn't quite as strong as the competition
- Only one capacity at 10 cups
Why we like it: With the outliers in terms of performance and presentation out of the way, the rest of the pack starts to look a lot more similar. If all you’re looking for is a quick, effective water filter pitcher that won’t require you to change the filters all the time, we recommend the Waterdrop 10-cup Water Filter Pitcher, which typically costs $30 or less.
Who is it best for: In terms of performance, it made a respectable dent in the TDS of our tap water, but where the Waterdrop really shines is in the lifespan of its filters. These filters last 200 gallons, while the rest of the units we tested range from 40-60 gallons. Better still, replacement filters are available in a three-pack for $42 ($14 each), which is great value. Plus, it comes in multiple colors. It is also said to remove PFOA/PFOS, iron, mercury, copper and more.
Who should not get it: If you're looking for a capacity that is not 10 cups, then another filter on this list would be better. Also note that these filters are more expensive than others at $14/filter, but they do last longer.
Pros
- No tools needed for installation
Cons
- Only available in white
Why we like it: Though we didn't perform hands-on testing of faucet water filters, we compared dozens of online reviews and customer input to land on a winner: Brita's Elite advanced water filter faucet system.
Who is it best for: Brita says this faucet filter removes 99% of contaminants in water, making it a perfect option for your home faucet. It also uses a 100-gallon filter, which the company says will last you approximately four months before you need to swap in a new one. Customers say installation is quick and easy.
Who should not get it: This faucet filter is only available in one color, which may not match with metal faucet fixtures. If you'd prefer something that doesn't require installation, a water pitcher would be a better pick.
Pros
- The effectiveness, removing 100% of TDS
Cons
- Expensive at around $18/filter
- Shorter lifespan
Why we like it: The ZeroWater filter was the only one that was able to remove 100% of TDS, making it our No. 1 pick for best pitcher and best filter cartridge. There are a few downsides when it comes to this filter, but they have nothing to do with how it performs.
Who is it best for: Those looking for an effective filter who don't mind the higher price.
Who should not get it: The ZeroWater replacement filter is on the pricier side, and the filter has to be changed more frequently than the runner-up Brita Elite filter. But if you purchase a 12-pack of the ZeroWater filters, you can save money and spend just over $10 on each one.
Best water filter pitchers compared
| Capacity | Pitcher cost | Filter replacement cost | Filter life | TDS (% change) | Certifications | Dishwasher safe | BPA free |
| 12, 22, 32, 52 cups | $25-$45 | $13+/filter | Depends on water quality and household use | -100 | International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO) against various NSF/ANSI standards | No | Yes |
| 6 and 10 cups | $20 | $5-8/filter | 2 months | -45.6 | Water Quality Association (WQA) against various NSF/ANSI standards | No | Yes |
| 5 and 7 cups | $130 | $8+/filter | 2 months | -39 | N/A | Yes | Yes |
| 8 cups | $80 | $26/filter | 150 gallons | N/A | Broward Testing Laboratory against various NSF/ANSI standards | No | Yes |
| 10 cups | $17 | $14/filter | 3 months or 200 gallons | N/A | NSF/ANSI certified | No | Yes |
The water filter that's best suited for you depends on a lot of factors, including how many people are in your household and where you live. U.S. News & World Report ranks Hawaii as having the best drinking water quality in the country, with Tennessee and Alabama landing in second and third place, respectively. So, if you live in a state that has consistently great drinking water, you might not need a heavy-duty water pitcher.
From our list, your best choice is most likely the Seychelle pH2O alkaline water filter pitcher for the possible health benefits. If you're located in a state with lower-quality drinking water, it's best to stick with our No. 1 pick, a ZeroWater pitcher; during our testing, it was best at removing dissolved solids.
Here is a list of the other water filter pitchers we've tested:
- AmazonBasics
- Brita Metro Standard
- Brita Everyday
- Brita Longlast Monterey
- Hydros Fast Flo
- Larq UV self-cleaning
- LifeStraw
- Pur Plus
- Soma
Brita is a name everybody is familiar with for a reason, and its filters will serve you well if that's the direction you choose to go. It's not as effective as the ZeroWater, but they are affordable, effective and have a respectable service life before requiring replacement.
An important item to consider when making your choice is the frequency and cost of replacement of the filter itself in your pitcher. The ZeroWater filters are priced at $35 for a two-pack and last for approximately 40 gallons. Brita filters are priced around $19 in a three-pack and last for the same amount of water. Waterdrop filters last five times as long, at 200 gallons, and are priced at $42 for a two-pack.
Assuming you'll be diligent at replacing the filters on time, these costs can add up over the duration of your use. Be sure to keep in mind that the overall quality of your tap water will affect the life of your filter; better quality water will ease the stress on the filter.
Can you spot the ZeroWater filter? It's the one on the far right.
Megan Wollerton/CNETAs you can see in the picture above, the ZeroWater filter on the far right is massive compared to others. That doesn't necessarily equal better performance, but in this case, the ZeroWater did soundly outperform the others in removing contaminants. ZeroWater says its five-stage filter is better at removing particles while preventing mold from growing with use. Based on our testing results, it seems the brand may be onto something.
(Keep in mind that filter life will vary based on the quality of your tap water and how much your filter has to "work" to remove impurities.)
As mentioned earlier in this article, there are quite a variety of contaminants worth removing from your tap water. The team here at our lab settled on three primary tests to benchmark the efficacy of these filters: TDS, pH and chlorine. Before we began the actual testing process, each pitcher was removed from the packaging, cleaned and then prepared per the manufacturer's instructions. This is very important, as most of these filters utilize activated carbon filtration, which will deposit sediment into the first batches of water that you filter if not cleaned properly in advance.
Testing for TDS
TDS stands for total dissolved solids and encompasses many different impurities present in water. Examples of the most common TDS include "calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, sulfate, chloride, nitrate and silica," according to the US Geological Survey. In practice, calcium and magnesium deposits in your tap water result in so-called "hard water" that tastes bad and can be actively detrimental to your health at higher concentrations. (Read more about TDS from the EPA and USGS.)
We began TDS testing by mixing an 8-gallon bucket of tap water, measured at a concentration of 220 ppm TDS, with table salt until we reached a TDS measurement of 300. Generally speaking, 50-150 TDS is considered an ideal range for drinking water. We used an Orapxi water quality tester to take these measurements and since the ZeroWater filter includes a TDS tester as well, all TDS readings were verified on both devices. Once we had established our control source, we measured 1 liter of the 300 TDS water into each of the water filter pitchers and allowed the full quantity to pass through the filter.
Once finished, we measured the TDS again and noted the percentage change using the pre- and post-filtration TDS measurements. This process was repeated for higher and lower TDS concentrations, and our findings indicate that each of the units we tested is very consistent at removing the same percentage of overall TDS from any water passing through it.
TDS test results
| -39 | |
| -45.6 | |
| -45.6 | |
| -3.1 | |
| -17.5 | |
| -2.2 | |
| -2 | |
| -6 | |
| -100 |
Chlorine removal testing
Chlorine in your drinking water may sound strange, but it is actually a very common practice for water treatment facilities to add chlorine to the water supply as a disinfectant. This is extremely effective at getting rid of other, nastier contaminants in the water, but the World Health Organization estimates that a concentration of ~0.2-4 ppm is standard for tap water, indicating that at least some is left over after disinfection. Chlorine can also impact the taste of water by giving it a chemical taste and odor.
For our testing, we decided to ramp things up a notch and test water prepared at a concentration similar to that of a swimming pool -- 10 ppm chlorine. This elevated chlorine testing of 10 ppm instead of ~0.2-4 ppm gave us a clear indication of the changes after filtration. Once again, each filter was tested with 1 liter of solution and compared to results from the water prefiltration and once again, filters such as the ZeroWater substantially outperformed the others.
pH Level Analysis
Finally, during TDS testing, we also measured the change in pH. pH stands for "potential of hydrogen" and is used to quantify the acidity of a substance. A pH of zero is extremely acidic, seven is considered neither acidic nor basic, and 14 represents an extremely basic substance. Since the minerals that comprise the TDS in tap water increase the alkalinity, we expected the filtration process to decrease the pH of the water. Indeed this did turn out to be the case, and you can see a table of the pH changes below.
Here's a table of our most recent TDS removal test results, calculated using the pre- and post-filtration pH measurement. The data represents an average of three test runs for each filter pitcher.
The ZeroWater pitcher managed to reduce all of the total dissolved solids in my tap water, from an average initial TDS reading of 57 ppm down to zero. Both Brita pitchers with the standard filter tied for second place, with a reduction of TDS from 57 down to 31 (a 45.6% decrease). The stylish (and expensive) Aarke also did well, removing nearly 40% of the TDS from tap water.
Water taste is a bit trickier to measure, but every pitcher did help reduce the slightly metallic taste of my tap water. Unsurprisingly, the ZeroWater pitcher model tasted the best, with no discernible metallic taste or scent.
Overall, the ZeroWater (ZP-010) made our job pretty easy. It completely dominated in terms of removing TDS and also happened to have one of the sturdiest designs. Other good options are here too: The Brita Metro Standard is a great budget filter pitcher that weighs less than ZeroWater's pitchers and has cheaper replacement filters. The Seychelle pH20 is a great pitcher pick if you want to add alkaline to water. Aarke's water purifier is my pick for the most stylish water pitcher with a sturdy build, stainless steel frame and glass pitcher. It costs much more than the others but offers a bit of elegance that few others do.
One thing to note is that we're really testing the filters here and not the pitcher itself. Because most home filter pitchers made by a single brand will use the same filter, you can bet that no matter which size or shape dispenser you choose, the filter should do the same job, for better or worse. ZeroWater, for instance, has a line of about six pitchers, jugs and dispensers in various sizes, all of which use the same very effective five-stage filter. The one caveat within the brands we've tested here is Brita which offers a LongLast filter that did not perform as well as the Legacy Brita filters.
Another big takeaway is just how widely filtered water pitchers can vary, both in terms of performance and even in terms of their key function, as in the case of alkaline pitchers. As long as you identify your needs before you buy, you're bound to find the right filtered water pitcher for you.
Type of filter
Most standard consumer filter pitchers reduce impurities that affect the taste and purity of water such as chlorine, lead, copper and other heavy metals. Other more expensive filter systems such as reverse osmosis and ion exchange can remove bacteria and viruses from water. For this list, we focused on basic, mechanical filters which comprise the majority of home filter pitcher types. Mechanical water filters, while limited in their function, are some of the most affordable and don't require costly installation.
Capacity and household size
Before you choose a model, consider how many water drinkers your filter pitcher will be used by and your daily water consumption needs. If it's just you or you and one other person, a small or medium pitcher will likely suffice. If your space is occupied by three or four water drinkers, consider a large pitcher or dispenser jug instead. You'll also want to take into account how much refrigerator space you have available if you plan to store your water filter pitcher there.
Material and build quality
The majority of water filter pitchers are made out of BPA-free plastic. Most are not dishwasher-safe. If you prefer a sturdier build, there are options for water filter pitchers made from glass and metal to add a refined touch to your H20 experience. Glass water filter pitcher mays be dishwasher-safe, but make sure to follow the manufacturer's instructions for cleaning.
Cost
Consider what you'd like to spend on your filter pitcher. There are options ranging from $20 up to $105 or more. If you opt for an integrated water filter system that filters water before it even reaches your tap, you can expect to pay well into the hundreds.
Consider the cost of the replacement filters, too. Most need to be replaced every three or so months and those costs can add up over the course of a year.
How does a water filter pitcher work?
All of the water filter pitchers we tested use activated carbon technology in some capacity in their filtration process. Activated carbon filters use porous carbon to trap particles through a process called adsorption, which attracts contaminants and holds them similar to the way a magnet would. As you pour the water into a filter it passes through a passage of this activated carbon and the impurities are removed. This also helps explain why you need to replace the filters periodically, as eventually there’s no more space to absorb more contaminants.
What contaminants should a water filter pitcher remove?
Most water filter pitchers will improve the taste and smell of drinking water by ridding it of odorous chemicals such as chlorine. Some more expensive or high-quality models also remove heavy metals, pesticides, PFAs, pathogens and other contaminants. Each water filter pitcher should state clearly on the packaging or website the exact materials it is intended to remove from water.
Which water filter pitcher removes the most contaminants?
In our testing, it was clear which water filter pitcher removed the most contaminants. The Zero Water pitcher, while significantly bigger than the other pitchers, removed all of the dissolved materials we were testing for.
We haven't tested them yet, there are more elaborate water filters that you can have built into your sink from brands including Aquasana and Hydroviv. These water filters may net better results but will run you in the $200-$500 range and require some form of installation which could incur even more costs.
Do water filter pitchers remove bacteria?
No. Water filter pitchers will remove many harmful contaminants like lead, copper, chlorine and organic compounds that affect the taste but they will do nothing to kill bacteria. Your tap water should already be treated for bacteria but if you're concerned about it, a standard water filter is not going to help.
If left unchanged for long periods, a water filter itself could build up grime that could potentially cause bacteria to grow and permeate your water. Because of that, be sure to change your filter regularly as prescribed by each brand.
How do you clean a water filter pitcher?
The most important thing you can do to keep your water filter pitcher clean is to change the filter. Most filter pitcher brands including Brita and ZeroWater recommend replacing the filter after about 40 gallons but this number varies by model.
The bulk of the water pitchers that we tested can and should be cleaned like any other piece of plastic kitchen gear every few weeks. You can remove the filter and rinse them by hand with hot water and soap, making sure to fully rinse the pitcher so as not to leave soap residue. Most water filter pitchers are dishwasher-safe as well. Just don't forget to remove the filter, which should never be cleaned with soap.
How about Brita versus Pur?
Both Pur and Brita are household names and available at most major retailers. Generally speaking, Pur may be slightly better than Brita for contaminant removal, but the filters themselves have a shorter lifespan and may be more expensive overall. Brita seems to focus on the taste of the water and has a longer lifespan for filters, and is generally easier to find.
